Understanding
Direct Tax
Proposals
Unexplained Money, Investments etc u/s 68, u/s 69, u/s 69A – 69D (section 115BBE)
Direct Tax
Proposals
Anti Evasion Measures & Prevention of
Generation & Circulation of Unaccounted Money
Cash Credits u/s 68
Present Law
|
Proposed Changes
|
ü If
any sum is found credited in the books of an assessee and assessee
Either
ü does
not offer any explanation about
nature and source of money;
Or
ü Explanation
is not satisfactory as per AO
Then,
ü Such
amount can be taxed as income of the assessee
|
ü Nature
and source of any sum credited,
ü Being Share
capital, Share Premium etc., in the books of a closely held company shall be treated as explained only if
ü Source of funds
is also explained by the assessee company in the hands of the resident shareholder.
Exemption if shareholders being
ü Venture
Capital Fund & Venture Capital Company registered with (SEBI)
|
Brief Comment:
The
amendment going to nullify the impact of few court decisions as under
v Hindustan
Inks & Resins Limited vs. DCIT 60 DTR 18 (Guj HC) : Assessee having established identity
of shareholders, addition under section 68 could not be made on the ground that
assessee failed to explain the source of credit.
v CIT vs.
STL Extrusion (p) Ltd. 333 ITR 269 (MP High Court) : Where
the Assessee had provided to the assessing authority the name, age, address,
date of filing the share application and number of shares applied by each
shareholder, addition under section 68 of the Act cannot be made.
v CIT vs.
Dataware (p) Ltd (Kolkata HC): Assessee’s
Assessing Officer cannot question Creditor’s I. T. Return.
v DCIT vs.
Dolphine Marbles (P) Ltd. 129 ITD 163 (Jabalpur ITAT): Assessee
had established identity of each of share holder, and also proved that each of
them was income tax assessee and share application money credited to their
accounts was duly reflected in their income tax returns and balance sheets. No
addition can be made.
v CIT vs.
Lovely Exports (p) Ltd 216 CTR 195 (SC): Court
held that if the share application money is received by the assessee from
alleged shareholders, whose names are given to AO, department is free to
proceed to reopen individual assessments. Further held that share application
money cannot be taxed u/s 68.
v
Will
help the government to curb unaccounted money.
v
Additional
Burden now on the assessee.
Extract of Memorandum:
“ Judicial
pronouncements, while recognizing that the pernicious practice of conversion of
unaccounted money through masquerade of investment in the share capital of a
company needs to be prevented, have advised a balance to be maintained
regarding onus of proof to be placed on the company
In the case of
closely held companies, investments are made by known persons. Therefore, a
higher onus is required to be placed on such companies besides the general onus
to establish identity and credit worthiness of creditor and genuineness of
transaction. This additional onus, needs to be placed on such companies to also
prove the source of money in the hands of such shareholder or persons making
payment towards issue of shares before such sum is accepted as genuine credit.”
Unexplained Money, Investments etc u/s 68, u/s 69, u/s 69A – 69D (section 115BBE)
Present Law
|
Proposed Changes
|
ü Certain
unexplained amounts are deemed as income
ü u/s
68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 69D of the Act
ü and
taxed as per Applicable TAX SLAB
Rate
ü In case of
individuals, HUF, no tax till basis exemption
|
ü Unexplained
credits, money, investment, expenditure, etc.,
ü u/s
68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 69D of the Act
ü shall be taxed @ 30%
(plus applicable surcharge /cess).
ü No deduction allowed
being any expenditure or allowance for earning said unexplained income.
|
Comment:
v To Curb Unaccounted money, govt is trying to penal provisions
has been made very harsh.
v Welcome Step by Government.
v Genuine cases may also have adverse implications.
Memorandum
explaining finance bill
“ In
these cases, no tax can be levied on these deemed income if the amount of such
deemed income is less than the amount of basic exemption limit and even if it
is higher, it is levied at the lower slab rate.
In order to curb the practice of
laundering of unaccounted money by taking advantage of basic exemption limit”
TDS on Transfer of Certain
Immovable Properties (Applicable w.e.f. 01-10-2012)
Taxable Event
Every Buyer at the time of making payment
or crediting any sum, being
Sale consideration for transfer of
immovable property (other than agricultural land),
Shall
deduct tax, at the rate of 1% of
such sum,
if the sale price paid or payable exceeds
»
INR 50,00,000 in case
property is situated in a specified “urban agglomeration” or
»
INR 20,00,000 in
other cases
Deemed Consideration
Where above sale consideration is less than Stamp Duty value
then Stamp duty value will be deemed sale
consideration
Procedural Aspects
Simple one page challan for payment of
TDS.
Containing PAN of transferor and transferee and also certain details of
the property.
Buyer will not required to obtain TAN or
file TDS statement
Seller will get the TDS credit on the
basis of above mentioned challan
Effect on Property Registration:
Property
will not be registered by Registrar
Unless
Buyer submits with the registrar both Proof of deduction and payment of TDS
Comment:
v To curb the circulation of black money and make the real
estate transaction more transparent and to enhance reporting criteria, the said
amendment is proposed to be introduced
v Buyer of the property has to deduct Tax @ 1% of the Sale
Consideration
v If Seller not furnishes PAN, then Section 206AA will be
effective and buyer should deduct tax @ 20%
v If the consideration is less than Stamp Duty value, stamp
duty shall be taken as full value of consideration
v Registrar will not register property unless Buyer submits
proof of TDS compliances
v What will be the status of the payment made on or before
01-10-2012 and registration done after 01-10-2012. A more clarity on this issue
shall be required.
v Buyer will not require to obtain TAN
v One Page challan for TDS payment
v Will buyer have to bear the TDS on differential amount of
sale consideration and stamp duty valuation?
Extract
of Memorandum:
“Better
compliance, it is also proposed to provide that a registering officer appointed
under the Indian Registration Act, 1908 (Registrar) shall not register the
transfer of any immovable property where taxes are required to be deducted
under this provision unless the transferee furnishes proof of deduction and
payment of TDS. For reducing the compliance burden on the transferee, it is
also proposed that a simple one page challan for payment of TDS would be
prescribed containing details (including PAN) of transferor and transferee and
also certain details of the property. The transferee would not be required to
obtain any Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TAN) or to furnish any
TDS statement as this would be mostly a one-time transaction. The transferor
would get credit of TDS like any other pre-paid taxes on the basis of
information furnished by the transferee in the challan of payment of TDS.”
TCS on Bullion / Jewellery /
Certain Minerals (Section 206C)
Present Law
|
Proposed Changes (w.e.f. 01-07-2012)
|
ü Tax
is required to collected at source
ü By
the Seller
ü At
the specified rate on goods like
·
Alcoholic liquor
·
Tendu leaves
·
Scrap etc.
|
ü Tax
is required to collected at source
ü By
the Seller from the buyer
ü At
the specified rate of 1% of sales
on
·
Bullion
·
Jewellery
ü If
Sale consideration exceeds INR 2,00,000 &
ü Sale
is in CASH.
ü Irrespective
of fact that buyer is a Manufacturer or trader or Purchase is for personal use
|
ü Presently
no TCS on sale of certain Minerals
|
ü Tax
is required to collected at source
ü By
the Seller from the buyer
ü At
the specified rate of 1% of sales
on
·
Coal
·
Lignite
·
Iron Ore
Exception
ü Used
for personal consumption
ü Used
for manufacturing, processing or producing article or things
|
Comment:
Bullion & Jewellery:
v For regulating the Bullion Market and to prevent circulation
of unaccounted money, this amendment is proposed to Introduced
v Purchase of Bullion or jewellery in cash in excess o INR
2,00,000, will be the charging criteria
v It is not clarified that whether threshold limit of INR
2,00,000 will apply for single transaction or aggregate of purchase during the
previous year
v Compliance burden will be on the seller of bullion or
jewellery. In case of Non compliances, all the penal provisions will be applicable
Minerals:
v For regulating the Mining Sector, to prevent the circulation
of unaccounted money and to collect the taxes at earliest stage, TCS provisions
on minerals are introduced
v Basically Applicable for entities engaged in Trading of coal,
lignite & ore.
v No Compliances will lead to all penal consequences prescribed
in IT Act
v No threshold limit prescribed, which means Tax should be
collected at source from INR 1 onwards
Extract of Memorandum:
“In order to reduce the quantum of cash
transaction in bullion and jewellery sector and for curbing the flow of
unaccounted money in the trading system of bullion and jewellery, ..............
Mining
sector is an important segment of Indian economy but the trading of minerals
remained largely unregulated resulting in non-reporting or under-reporting of
trading in minerals trading transactions for the taxation purpose.
In order to collect tax at the earliest
point of time and also to improve reporting mechanism of transactions in mining
sector, it is proposed............................“
Share Premium in excess of
FMV will be treated as Income [u/s 56(2)]
Existing Act
|
New Proposed Clause
|
ü Specific
Category of Income will be
ü Taxed
under
ü Income
from Other Sources (IOS).
|
Taxability
ü where
a Company (NOT being a company in
which public are substantially interested) ,
ü Receives,
from any resident Consideration for
issue of shares
ü Which
exceeds Face value of such shares,
then
ü the
aggregate consideration received, as
exceeds, the FMV of shares
ü Shall
be taxed under the head “Income from other sources.
ü Company
will be provided an opportunity to substantiate its claim regarding the FMV.
Calculation of FMV,
being HIGHER of value
ü as
may be determined in accordance with the method as may be prescribed; or
ü as
may be substantiated by the company to the satisfaction of the AO , based on
the value of its assets, including intangible assets, being goodwill,
know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other
business or commercial rights of similar nature.
Exemption
ü Where
the Recipient of consideration is a venture capital undertaking from a
venture Capital Company or a venture capital fund.
|
Comment:
v Excess share premium received by Unlisted Company for issue
of shares to Residents will be taxable as Income from other sources
v This
amendment will prevent unlisted companies to issue their shares at a high
premium, a normal practice prevalent in India.
v Section 56(1)(viia) states that if a person acquires shares
at a price which is less than ‘fair value’, the difference may be treated as
income in the hands of such shareholder.
Hence, if shares
are issued at a price Higher than FMV, the difference shall be treated as
income in the hands of the Company, while if shares are issued at a price lower
than fair value, then the difference may be treated as income in the hands of
the shareholder.
v Provisions will not be applicable on issue of debentures BUT
may be applicable for preference shares
v Provisions will not be applicable when shares will be issued
to a non resident
v AO has been given a wide power to invoke this section FMV
will be determined as per satisfaction of the AO
v VCF/ VCC has been given exemption for this section
Assets held outside India
Section
|
Existing
Act
|
Proposed Changes
|
|
Compulsory Return Filing
|
|||
139
|
ü Every person is
required to furnish ROI
ü if Total income during
the previous year
ü Exceeds the maximum
amount which is not chargeable to tax
|
ü It will be Mandatory
for Every Residents
ü HAVING ANY ASSETS (Including Financial interest
in any entity)
ü LOCATED OUTSIDE INDIA, or
ü Signing Authority in any a/c located
outside India
ü Irrespective of the fact
ü whether the resident
taxpayer
ü Has taxable income or not
ü W.R.E.F. AY 2012-13
|
|
Reopening upto 16 years
|
|||
149
|
ü Time limit for issue of
notice
ü for reopening of Assessment
ü on account of income
escaping assessment is 6 years
|
ü Income in relation to any asset (including financial
interest in any entity) located outside India,
ü chargeable to tax,
ü has escaped assessment,
ü Time limit for issue of
notice
ü for reopening of Assessment
ü will be 16 years
Reopening can be made for any assessment year
on or before 01-04-2012
|
|
Deemed Income Escaping
|
|||
147
|
Income deemed to escape
assessments, when
ü No ROI by assessee, even
if total income exceeds exemption limit
ü ROI Furnished and no
assessment made and AO finds excessive losses, allowances, deductions etc
ü When Assessment made
and Income under assessed or excess deduction allowed etc
|
ü Income shall be deemed
to have escaped assessment
ü where a person is found
to have
ü any asset (including financial interest in any
entity) located outside India
ü W.E.F. 01-07-2012
|
|
Extended Time limit for Assessment, when information sought
under DTAA
|
|||
153 / 153B
|
ü Time limit for
Completion of assessment shall exclude
ü Time taken in obtaining
information from foreign tax authorities
ü It starts from the date on which the process of getting information
is initiated and end with the date
on which information is Received by the Commissioner
ü Currently, this period of exclusion is limited to
“SIX MONTHS”
|
ü Period of Limitation
extended to “1 year”
ü W.e.f. 01-07-2012.
|
|
Comment:
v As per survey, unaccounted money or Investments of Residents
Indian abroad is much higher than the budgeted expenditure of the govt.
v To Track Unaccounted money, Un-Disclosed assets located
outside India & to track all such transactions, these amendments are
proposed in the Finance Bill.
v For Resident assessee, it is mandatory to file return of
Income for AY 2012-13 and succeeding years, if any assets including financial
interest are outside India.
v In case of resident assessee having signing authority in any
account outside India, then also have to file ROI.
v If Resident assessee has not disclosed “Such Assets”, it
shall be presumed that his Income has escape assessments and his case will be
reopened.
v To give more time to track such type of transactions,
Reopening can be made UPTO 16 YEARS.
Memorandum explaining finance bill “The
time limit of 6 years is not sufficient in cases where assets are located
outside India because gathering information regarding such assets takes much
more time on account of additional procedures and laws of foreign
jurisdictions” affirms the same.
v Extended time of 1 year provided to Taxing authority, when
information sought under DTAA.
No comments:
Post a Comment